Best practices for authors of healthcare-related articial intelligence manuscripts Since its inception in 2017, npj Digital Medicine has attracted a disproportionate number of manuscripts reporting on uses of . What does the status of my submission mean in Editorial Manager? //--> The Miss North Carolina's Outstanding Teen competition will Use the appropriate tab to easily toggle among Library, Builder, and Viewer. Best Dear Dr. Nisar Ahmed, it is very frustrating for a researcher to wait for such long time. Typically, after a paper is submitted to a journal, a journal editor screens the manuscript and decides whether or not to send it for full peer review. Based on the npj Quantum Information Review Speed Feedback System, it takes authors 70.0 days to get the first editorial decision. Use distinct colors with comparable visibility and avoid the use of red and green for contrast. on 22 Dec, 2017, Answered by Radhika Shridhar Editorial Manager displays status terms as described in the table below. You will be asked to complete and submit the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary together with the revised version of your manuscript after peer-review. If an author wishes to appeal against Nature's decision, the appeal must be made in writing, not by telephone, and should be confined to the scientific case for publication. No products in the cart. either in the manuscript text, supplementary information, or the Methods section, as appropriate. Does "Under Review" mean that the paper has passed the editorial check? Our contribution is organized as follows. Your script could be better than the image of the journal. The main editor is usually quite quick (a couple of days or so) because their just gauging scope and relavence. Flash Fiction: Something From Which Another Originates? Trapdoor Twenty One Pilots, Editor-in-Chief Decision Complete. Hi, Ahmed, How long one should wait on an editor's decision depends on a variety of factors - your stature within your profession, the quality of t Parents faced with decision to vaccinate their kids against COVID-19 Pfizer was given green light by the FDA to move forward with vaccinations for kids ages 12 to 15 on Monday. The most serious reactions develop within 30 min after the injection, and patients are advised to wait in their . Data availability statements should be provided as a separate section after the Methods section before the References, under the heading "Data Availability". Party Wholesale Outlet, Other factor is how much time the journal gives to the reviewers. Author KL has previously acted as a paid consultant for [company name B] but declares no non-financial competing interests. Use of the word "significant" should always be accompanied by a P value; otherwise, use "substantial," "considerable," etc. Chem, 2016, 1 (1), 147-153. If the editor is active then it won't take much time for your paper to be desk rejected or to be send to the reviewers. I think it seems a long time for this step. If an author has subsequently moved, the current address may also be stated. While the metrics presented here are not intended to be a definitive list, we hope that they will prove to be informative. ]]> HANDBOOK: Keep calm and wait: A guide to understanding journal statuses. For new biopolymeric materials (oligosaccharides, peptides, nucleic acids, etc. At this point, a status of reviewed, no decision made basically means exactly what it sounds like: Your file has been received, it has been deemed complete, it has been read by at least one person, and no decision has been made on it. Data availability statements should provide a statement about the availability of the minimal dataset that would be necessary to interpret, replicate and build upon the methods or findings reported in the article. Authors are encouraged to seek copy editing or language editing services for their manuscripts, either before submission or at the revision stage, should they feel it would benefit their manuscript. Unusual units or abbreviations should be spelled out in full or defined in the legend. Authors AB, EF, GH declare no financial or non-financial competing interests. If the data do not meet the assumptions of the test, then a non-parametric alternative should be used instead. When finished, click click Build PDF for Approval to complete the submission process and proceed to the Revisions Waiting Approval by Author folder. 2016513Chem Liu, L.; Ruiz, David A.; Munz, D.; Bertrand, G., A Singlet Phosphinidene Stable at Room Temperature. 2 year Impact Factor (2021) - 14. . Volume numbers and the subsequent comma appear in bold. What does a quick change from 'Under consideration' to 'Decision made' back to 'Under consideration' mean for Nature? We request that authors avoid "data not shown" statements and instead make their data available via deposition in a public repository (see 'Reporting standards and availability of data, materials, code and protocols' for more information). Labeling must be of sufficient size and contrast to be readable, even after appropriate reduction. In the third section, the data and their preparation are described in more detail, elaborating on why a social network approach appears to be suitable for exploring relationships between events of the editorial process mediated by the system. Manuscripts submitted to npj Computational Materials do not need to adhere to our formatting requirements at the point of initial submission; formatting requirements only apply at the time of acceptance. report structure without waiting to return the values for the data. Although the COVID-19 pandemic has increased the importance of digital technology in clinical trial implementation, there is a dearth of literature reporting on challenges and strategies related to multi-site randomized controlled trials (RCTs) among pediatric cancer survivors during the pandemic. We encourage you to make them available by uploading the structures in any of the existing data repositories (see e.g. The npj Series journals require an Author Contribution Statement that specifies the individual contributions of each co-author. A description of the statistical treatment of error analysis should be included in the figure legend. Author CD declares no financial competing interests. Thousands should be separated by commas (1,000). You have completed the submission and approval steps, and the article has been submitted to the journal. It stated 'Under consideration' until today, when it changed to 'Decision made,' and then back to 'Under consideration.' What does the status 'under editor evaluation' mean? Before a manuscript is submitted, please review our Editorial policies, and ensure that the submission complies with our policy requirements. Large Language Models (LLMs), such as ChatGPT, do not currently satisfy our authorship criteria. Book titles should be given in italics and all words in the title should have initial capitals. Suitably high resolution figures may be inserted within the text at appropriate positions or grouped at the end. Journal names are italicized and abbreviated (with full stops) according to common usage. ), direct structural analysis by NMR spectroscopic methods may not be possible. The funder played no role in study design, data collection, analysis and interpretation of data, or the writing of this manuscript. The form can also be requested by the authors from the NPJ managing editor at this e-mail address: npjeditor@frontiernet.net. The Editor may be reading and assessing the submission, assigning additional editors according to the journal's polices, or taking some other action outside of the system. These requirements aim to improve the transparency of reporting and the reproducibility of published results. Online material: There are several factors that influence the time taken for review, most notably availability of article referees. What is the meaning of "decision in process" status? Locate the submission in Submission Requiring Author Approval or Revisions Requiring Author Approval, and see here for more details. For some journals, the status may include the decision term e.g. Editorial Board. This checklist is not sent to the Reviewers but must be received by the Editors before the paper can be sent for peer-review. Any previously unreported custom computer code or scripts used to generate results reported in the manuscript that are central to the main claims must be made available to Editors and referees upon request. Approved human gene symbols are provided by HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee (HGNC), e-mail: hgnc@genenames.org; see also www.genenames.org. When electronic structure calculations are reported in the manuscript, the atomic coordinates of the optimised computational models should be provided. This is known as a rescinding. Thank you for visiting nature.com. . Some of the most important digital technologies introduced in the dental filed are cone beam computer . accept after major revisions (conditional acceptance ): the journal will publish the paper provided the authors make the changes suggested by the reviewers and/or editors revise and resubmit (conditional rejection): the journal is willing to reconsider the paper in another round of decision making after the authors make major changes How long time should we wait for editor decision on a manuscript? The thinnest lines in the final figure should be no smaller than one point wide. It is also appropriate to include suggested or excluded referees in the cover letter. Full disclosure: Editage Insights is a product of Editage, a global provider of world-class scientific communication solutions. Ranges are more appropriate than standard deviations or standard errors for small data sets. Does "Under Review" mean that the paper has passed the editorial check? When possible, we prefer to use original digital figures to ensure the highest-quality reproduction in the journal. They generally mention the average time for the first decision. Thia, her allies, and her crow, Res, are planning a rebellion to defeat Queen Razel and Illucia once and for all. Mechanistic Aspect. Read Editage Insights in your favorite RSS Reader. 2. Bellin, D. L. et al. SCIWaiting to Send Decision to Author, @12:21ManuscptReviseandRe-Review, @5:, , @13:ManuscptReviseandRe-Review, @16:, Geotechnical Engineeng With Assessor, SCIreviewNot Assigned, SCIreviewers assigend, , Eupean Polymer Journal with editor, sciunder review reviews invited, IEEE Transactions on Power Electnics. Answer: When the status for a manuscript changes "Under Review" to "Ready for Decision", it means that the peer-review process is complete and only the editorial decision is pending. by | Jun 21, 2022 | what is the most accurate latin translator | burlington iowa arrests | Jun 21, 2022 | what is the most accurate latin translator | burlington iowa arrests We cannot offer to provide corrected reprints with higher image quality if only poor quality images were supplied at accept stage. In the case, BP P.L.C. The Editors have begun a decision in the system. A limited number of uncaptioned graphics depicting chemical structureseach labeled with their name, by a defined abbreviation, or by the bold Arabic numeralmay be included in a manuscript. Each complete figure must be supplied as a separate file upload. SCI . What does a status change from "Required reviews completed" back to "Under review" mean? //-->