This article updates a series of articles, including pro/con arguments on merit selection of judges, that were previously published in North Carolina Insight and now are contained in the latest edition of North Carolina Focus: Jack Betts, "The Debate Over Merit Selection of Judges," North Carolina Focus, N. C. Center for . Your membership has expired - last chance for uninterrupted access to free CLE and other benefits. 623, 665-66 (2009), available at http://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1386&context=dlj; Joanna M. Shepherd, Are Appointed Judges Strategic Too?, 58 Duke L.J. David E. Pozen, The Irony of Judicial Elections, 108 Colum. 1203, 1235-38 (2009) (state courts); Alliance for Justice, Broadening the Bench: Professional Diversity and Judicial Nominations 8-10 (2016) (federal courts), available at http://www.afj.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/Professional-Diversity-Report.pdf. James Sample et al., The New Politics of Judicial Elections 2000-2009: Decade of Change 4 (Charles Hall ed., 2010), available at http://www.brennancenter.org/publication/new-politicsjudicial-elections-2000-2009-decade-change. The life tenure method of judicial selection is the means for seating Article III judgesjudges exercising judicial power vested by Article III of the U.S. Constitutionin the United States federal courts. Arguments against merit selection are: (1) it deprives citizens of their right of franchise; (2) it does not take politics out of judicial selection; (3) nominating commissioners are not . The two most common methods of selecting state judges (as opposed to federal judges) are election and merit selection. 4, 2010) (Impeachment of G. Thomas Porteous, Jr., Judge of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Lousiana), https://www.congress.gov/congressional-report/111th-congress/house-report/427/1. About half of all federal judges (currently 870) are Article III judges: nine on the U.S. Supreme Court, 179 on the courts of appeals, 673 on the district courts, and nine on the U.S. Court of International Trade.1. Each process has its pros and cons but there is one that easily stands out from the others. To carry out their duties as a judge it is vital that they are impartial, and the party political system and method of voting would guarantee that they would lack that necessary impartiality that is needed. Downloada printablePDF of this article (log in for access). 9. According to Goelzhauser, if merit selection works as intended, commissions and governors should be selecting on qualifications and diversity rather than political considerations (p. 56). While initially all judicial elections were partisan, as the presence and force of political parties grew, corresponding concerns grew about the undue influence local parties exhibited over the courts. MERIT SELECTION. However, he pointedly notes that serious concerns of transparency accompany merit selection systems (p. 139), concerns that are as important as the other findings produced by Goelzhausers analyses. Ciara Torres-Spelliscy et al., Brennan Ctr. Presumably, these results would vary depending on which party is dominant in state politics. Another important pro of having a merit-based system of judicial appointments is that it takes the process out of the hands of voters, avoiding one of the most popular alternatives to judicial appointments. Party voters who participate in their respective primaries can seek to use party affiliation to ensure that the candidates who best typify their values can move forward to the general election. 1, Everyone interested in contributing [in a judicial election] has very specific interests. However, the lack of accessible data makes it difficult for researchers and policymakers to compare and assess the performance of merit selection systems across states and precludes even the possibility of meaningful internal evaluation (p. 133). Then, using multi-method research approaches involving meticulous case study analyses and impressive original datasets, Goelzhauser provides an insightful and thought-provoking exploration of the stages and implementation of judicial merit selection. As Goelzhauser notes throughout the book, transparency gaps complicate assessment of merit selection performance from a multi-state perspective; however, Nebraskas merit selection system is representative of merit systems in a number of states, so the analyses and findings offer broader insights useful beyond Nebraska state lines. At the same time, almost every state gives the governor the power to make appointments for interim vacancies, which occur when a seat opens before the end of a judges term. 1. Ideally, being able to elect judges seems like a fair concept. Between 2000 and 2009, 20 of the 22 states that use contested elections to choose their supreme courts set spending records. Gerald C. Wright, Charles Adrian and the Study of Nonpartisan Elections, 61 Pol. The initial term of office is one years. See Joanna M. Shepherd, Money, Politics, and Impartial Justice, 58 Duke L.J. The theme this year is "Celebrate Your Freedom: Independent Courts Protect Our Liberties.". The Pay is Good. 11. Used by the state to select judges for its appellate and trial courts, the Ohio method of judicial selection consists of an initial partisan primary election, followed by a nonpartisan general election.21 Ohio first implemented contested partisan judicial elections in 1851, later moving to nonpartisan judicial elections under its 1911 Nonpartisan Judiciary Act. Most proposals fall into two categories. Your membership has expired - last chance for uninterrupted access to free CLE and other benefits. Goelzhausers work sheds new light on judicial merit selection processes and raises important questions for future researchers. Once a merit-based system is in place, all subsequent judges will have only the traits that allow them to sit on the bench. His discussion of the use of judicial selection in a variety of specifications at the federal level (i.e., for federal magistrate judges) and internationally illustrates that American states are not the only laboratories for institutional experimentation with merit selection. Educators go through a rigorous application process, and every answer they submit is reviewed by our in-house editorial team. It's time to renew your membership and keep access to free CLE, valuable publications and more. For rural counties, the electorate . On the question of the initial or interim selection of judges to fill vacant seats, here, too, those considering reform should look at a wide range of options, considering the likely impact, and tradeoffs, associated with different selection options. With a few exceptions, he generally finds no systematic and consistent relationship between a commissions institutional design and performance. In recent years, Citizens United v. FEC, which barred restrictions on independent spending by corporations and unions, has also cast a long shadow, with spending by outside groupsmany of which do not disclose their donorssurging. Judges are subject to retention elections for six-year terms. The decision to run for office entails substantial cost that may dissuade potential candidates. What are the pros and cons of electing judges? The question of who sits on the bench has high stakes, and judicial elections are increasingly indistinguishable from the rough-and-tumble of ordinary politics, with troubling implications for the integrity of state courts. That said, the ensuing year saw a progressive majority at the states constitutional convention push through a proposal allowing primary nominations for elected offices. 895, 912-13 (1998); Jim Walker, The Politics of State Courts, in The Judicial Branch of State Government: People, Process, and Politics 171, 178 (Sean OHogan ed., 2006). See Monika L. McDermott, Race and Gender Cues in Low-Information Elections, 51 Pol. 5. The partisan election of judges is a selection method where judges are chosen through elections where they are listed on the ballot with an indication of their political affiliation.. As of December 2021, eight states used this method at the state supreme court level and eight states used this selection method for at least one type of court below the supreme court level. See Torres-Spelliscy et al., supra note 20, at 1-2. Also known as the Merit Selection Plan, the Missouri Nonpartisan Court Plan is referred to as a merit selection system that sees judicial candidates nominated by a nonpartisan commission who are then presented to the governor (or legislative body) for review and ultimate appointment. Bolch Judicial Institute
Advocates for the life tenure system believe it encourages judicial independence and decreases the likelihood of partisan influences. The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour, and shall, at stated Times, receive for their Services, a Compensation, which shall not be diminished during their Continuance in Office.); see also Judith Resnik, Judicial Selection and Democratic Theory: Demand, Supply, and Life Tenure, 26 Cardozo L. Rev. Moving past existing debates opens up the possibility of new selection models better suited to addressing the challenges facing state courts today. It is bad enough that politically-inspiredlaws can be passed by legislators who are beholden to the interest groups that got them elected, we do not also need judges who have to interpret the law in a certain way in order to remain elected. However, any judicial appointment system is rife with cons as well. Specifically, attorneys who are ideologically congruent with the appointing governor are more likely to apply for vacant judgeships (p. 87). Supporters of nonpartisan elections claim that the system stays true to the principles of popular consent and accountability that led to the first judicial elections.18 Nonpartisan elections still hold judicial candidates accountable to the public; however, candidates would not need to find themselves in deference to a larger, party apparatus. Jurors have more compassion than judges. If a primary election is held, it is not to narrow the candidates to one from each party. Judges are not politicians, even when they come to the bench by way of the ballot.Williams-Yulee v. The Florida Bar (Roberts, C.J.) September 16, 2012. for Civil Rights Under Law, Answering the Call for a More Diverse Judiciary: A Review of State Judicial Selection Models and Their Impact on Diversity 10 (2005), available at https://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/sites/default/files/answering_20050923.pdf. for Justice, Improving Judicial Diversity 4 (2d ed. Judges should not be politically elected, because it would be disastrous to have judges act as politicians do. The above two posts make it completely clear that it would be very dangerous to elect judges as politicians are elected. American Judicature Society, Campaign Contributors and the Nevada Supreme Court 2 (2010), available at http://www.judicialselection.us/uploads/documents/AJS_NV_study_FINAL_A3A7D42494729.pdf. Merit selectionparticularly the three-step versionaddresses each of these concerns. The chief con with appointing judges is that, paradoxically, it may be just as political as letting regular voters select their judges. The concern with capture is that it can have deleterious effects on judicial performance as certain interests work to shape a judiciary that aligns with their preferences, as opposed to a focus on merit. Judges must follow their understanding of what the law requires, even if it is unpopular. One striking factor is that while elective and appointive systems are often described in opposition to each other, the majority of states have elements of both systems. in Am. Ninety-five percent of all cases are filed in state court, with more than 100 million cases coming before nearly 30,000 state court judges each year. 1589, 1617-21 (2009), available at http://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1409&context=dlj. Retention elections, where a sitting judge is unopposed and faces an up-or-down vote, are the most common reselection method (used in 19 states), suggesting the importance of understanding how retention elections operate and the incentives they create.28. More attention needs to be paid to protecting judges from the crocodile in the bathtubthe effect job security can have on decision-making in high-salience cases. What are the strengths and weakness of the legislative branch? In recent decades, and particularly since 2000, state supreme court elections have become increasingly costly and politicized. Matthew J. Streb, Running for Judge: The Rising Political, Financial, and Legal Stakes of Judicial Elections, Richard Watson & Rondal Downing, The Politics of the Bench and the Bar: Judicial Selection Under the Missouri Nonpartisan Court Plan, Jeffrey Sutton, 51 Imperfect Solutions: States and the Making of American Constitutional Law, /content/aba-cms-dotorg/en/groups/judicial/publications/judges_journal/2021/fall/judicial-selection-the-united-states-overview, https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/allauth.pdf, https://www.congress.gov/congressional-report/111th-congress/house-report/427/1, https://www.uscourts.gov/judges-judgeships/about-federal-judges, https://fedsoc.org/commentary/publications/the-case-for-partisan-judicial-elections, https://ballotpedia.org/Nonpartisan_election_of_judges, https://www.lindenwood.edu/files/resources/stuteville.pdf. 1. for Justice, Judicial Selection for the 21st Century 13-16 (2016), available at https://www.brennancenter.org/publication/judicial-selection-21st-century. Surprisingly, relatively little attention has been paid to reselection as such, and how these unique pressures might be mitigated, regardless of how a judge initially made it onto the bench. Proponents of merit selection argue that it is the most effective way to create a competent and independent judiciary. Debates over judicial selection are often framed as a choice between contested elections and merit selection, in which a nominating commission vets potential candidates who are appointed by the governor and then typically stand for periodic yes-or-no retention elections. These are just a few examples of how the selection of state court judges has become increasingly politicized, polarized, and dominated by special interestsparticularly in the 39 states that use elections as part of their system for choosing judges. They are first nominated by the president of the United States, and then with the Advice and Consent of the U.S. Senate, confirmed pursuant to the Appointments Clause in Article II of the U.S. Constitution.2 Envisioned by the framers as a means to insulate the courts from shifts in the public consensus, life tenure is derived from the good Behaviour clause in Article III of the Constitution, a concept tracing back to England.3 This system of life tenure for Article III judges has existed, more or less uninterrupted, since the Constitution was ratified in 1788. 3. See John F. Kowal, Brennan Ctr. Finally, another con of a merit-based system of appointing judges is that deciding, once and for all, what it means to be a "good" judge is inherently impirical. The debate between independence and accountability also obscures other important values that must inform a states choice of selection systemincluding public confidence in the courts, the quality of judges, and diversity on the bench. For example, can nominating commissions be structured in a way that more effectively promotes democratic legitimacy and diversity? Only three statesMassachusetts, New Hampshire, and Rhode Islandhave life tenure (with or without a mandatory retirement age) for judges. See Matthew J. Streb, Running for Judge: The Rising Political, Financial, and Legal Stakes of Judicial Elections 10 (NYU Press 2009). Iowa Governor Kim Reynolds recently signed legislation that would increase her appointment power over the state's judicial merit selection commission by removing the senior supreme court justice from the 17-member commission and giving the governor the authority to fill the particular seat. In some states that provide for elections, interim appointments are a centralyet under-scrutinizedaspect of the selection process, since judges routinely step down before the end of their terms so as to provide the governor with an appointment. Five states have gubernatorial or legislative appointments without a nominating commission, 16 states have merit selection through a nominating commission, and nine states (including Florida) have combined merit selection and other methods to select their judges. Some answers to commissioner questions suggested strategic behavior on the part of applicants whose partisan leaning was slightly out-of-step with the state political environment. 579, 580 (2005). for Justice Judicial Selection: An Interactive Map, http://judicialselectionmap.brennancenter.org/?court=Supreme (last visited Sept. 2, 2016). Tony A. Freyer, American Liberalism and the Warren Courts Legacy, in 27 Revs. 8. Nearly 90 years ago, U.S. Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis famously wrote: It is one of the happy incidents of the federal system that a single courageous State may, if its citizens choose, serve as a laboratory; and try novel social and economic experiments without risk to the rest of the country.26 Judicial selection in the United States is a wonderfully rich example of that maxim. Goelzhauser provides clear empirical measures for his concepts of interest. Debate will (and should) continue as to the best way for a given jurisdiction to select its judiciary. Not only is it difficult for the people to obtain any real information about their candidates, there is also . Its very hard not to dance with the one who brung you.13. With a trial by jury, you can use emotional arguments to your advantage, as jurors are more susceptible to being influenced by the personal appeal of an argument or testimony. eNotes Editorial, 11 Jan. 2018, https://www.enotes.com/homework-help/what-pros-cons-merit-appointment-system-selec-396472. pros and cons of merit selection of judgeseagles hotel california tour 2022 setlisteagles hotel california tour 2022 setlist Guest columnists write their own views on subjects they choose, which do not necessarily reflect the opinions of this newspaper. . Those who support electing judges indicate that the benefits include allowing voters the opportunity to provide accountability through self-government by the voters, awareness of the political preferences of judges to the voters, and more public control of a judicial system that is dealing with aggressive lawsuits, such as the recent tobacco and ongoing gun cases. Studies of the U.S. government study more individuals than parties. What that best way is, of course, subject to that debate. Those who oppose merit selection argue it is the right of citizens to vote for all office-holders, including judges, and that politics is still pervasive in the nominating process, but is more difficult to monitor. Appointed judges then serve for a term of years and are then required to run for retention.23 The system traces back to a voter initiative to implement merit selection passed by the state of Missouri in 1940 and has grown progressively more popular in the states during the latter half of the twentieth century. EDITOR'S NOTE: This is the last of six guest columns written by Hernando County Bar Association members and published on this page during Law Week, which began Sunday. 1. I highly recommend Judicial Merit Selection: Institutional Design and Performance for State Courts, as this work will be of great interest to students and scholars of judicial politics, comparative institutionalists, legal scholars, transparency advocates, and state officials. Pros And Cons Of Merit Selection. The jury system works by using a group of people from the community. Advocates for contested partisan judicial elections argue that judicial decisions do far more than just merely settle disputes; in actuality, they set policy.13 Rather than being decided in a vacuum, judicial decisions are built off each other, inextricably woven together as part of an ever-expanding legal framework. art. See Kate Berry, Brennan Ctr. of the U.S. Courts at 8 (of 8), https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/allauth.pdf (last visited June 6, 2021). Elections make judges more democratically accountable David Dewold. As far as I am concerned, there are a lot of pros and really no cons that I think are valid concerns. Nonpartisan elections were adopted in an attempt to help restore the integrity of the courts while helping break party strangleholds, with Cook County, Illinois, becoming the first to implement the method in 1873.16 As of today, 13 states still rely on contested nonpartisan elections (Arkansas, Georgia, Idaho, Kentucky, Minnesota, Mississippi, Montana, Nevada, North Dakota, Oregon, Washington, West Virginia, and Wisconsin) to elect their supreme court justices.17. As seen over the course of the past century, changes regarding civil liberties, reproductive rights, and religious freedoms have been secured through precedents established by judicial decisions. However, voter participation in primary elections tends to skew lower when compared with participation in general elections, with voters in primaries more often consisting of party loyalists rather than casual participants. This, supporters claim, provides a degree of thoughtfulness on the part of the voters that can produce a truly independent bench equipped to address the communitys needs. 17. Merit selection acknowledges and accounts for the thought that knowing what individual character traits and characteristics comprise a qualitatively "good" judicial candidate are not necessarily something within the public sphere of knowledge. One component of Goelzhausers analysis of whether merit selection works involves examination across three key metrics: judicial quality, judge diversity, and the influence of partisanship. She was known for her balanced and dispassionate opinions. See About Federal Judges, U.S. Readers also gain insight into the questions posed by commissioners to candidates during the interview stage (after the commission has narrowed the list of applicants). 4. Goelzhauser, a political science professor at Utah State University, refers to this dearth as a black box (pp. Critics of the approach claim that the need for voters to fully familiarize themselves with the candidates can prove to be a double-edged sword.19 They argue that party affiliation serves as a basic shorthand for voters on where the candidate may land on major issues. Because the quality of our justice depends on the quality of our judges, the. And the promise of higher-quality judges, greater diversity, and reduced partisanship seems to be highly dependent on whether the merit selection applicant pool is somehow distorted (p. 79). 23. Any alternative system of choosing judges will have its own advantages and disadvantages, and may advance or impede important values related to the selection of judgesincluding judicial independence, judicial accountability and democratic legitimacy, judicial quality, public confidence in the courts, and diversity on the bench.27 There are important empirical questions about the likely impact of different systems on these values. Goelzhauser offers useful and practical suggestions for ways in which states can facilitate increased transparency, such as anonymizing applicant data. This first con hints at the real problem with a "merit-based" appointment system for judges: what is "merit"? The biggest pro of having a merit-based system of appointment is simple: you get the best and most qualified judges sitting on the bench. Under this process, the Governor appoints new Justices from a list of three to six names submitted by a Judicial Nominating Commission. A nominating committee comprised of both lawyers and nonlawyers presents the. To empirically test his propositions, Goelzhauser amasses an impressive dataset with approximately 190,000 judge-vacancy observations from Alaska that include individuals who applied for each judicial vacancy since admission to statehood (p. 85). DOWNERS GROVE I agree that something should be done to improve the judicial selection . I would much rather have a constitutional scholar, a judge with vast experience in the law itself, than someone with a pretty face and a good election slogan who knows how to be popular. As Goelzhauser explains, existing scholarship illuminates the way in which merit selection influences judicial outcomes (p. 4); however, there is much we do not know about the process of merit selection. States have also lagged in adopting either reform. The Diane Rehm Show discusses how judicial elections and appointment processes impact fairness in state courts. Several of the most serious threats to equal justice stem from the growing politicization of judicial elections. Considering these values offers new potential paths for reform. 22. PROS, CONS ON . See Kathleen L. Barber, Ohio Judicial ElectionsNonpartisan Premises with Partisan Results, 32 Ohio St. L.J. Proponents of Nevada's system of electing judges have argued that competitive election of judges is the most democratic way of ensuring that judges remain accountable to the people. In my opinion, district attorneys and judges should not be popularly elected on regular, short terms. The biggest pro of having a merit-based system of appointment is simple: you get the best and most qualified judges sitting on the bench. 18. By continuing to use this website, you consent to Duke University's usage of cookies and similar technologies, in accordance with the Duke Privacy Statement. Alicia Bannon et al., The New Politics of Judicial Elections 2011-2012: How New Waves of Special Interest Spending Raised the Stakes for Fair Courts 24-25 (Laurie Kinney & Peter Hardin eds., 2013), available at https://www.brennancenter.org/publication/new-politics-judicial-elections-2011-12. Merit selection went through a period of broad adoption in the 1960s and 1970s. Res. U.S. Const. Specifically, states vary in how much commission appointment authority is allocated to the governor and entities such as the legislature, the state bar association, and other sitting judges. 14. Criminal justice issues are particularly salient: in 2013-14, a record 56 percent of all ad spots either praised or attacked a candidates criminal justice record, often singling out individual decisions for criticism.7 In recent years, judges have been attacked for expressing sympathy for rapists and protect[ing] . Cts., https://www.uscourts.gov/judges-judgeships/about-federal-judges (last visited June 29, 2021). Chicago Tribune. 16. With executive and legislative races (both federally and in the states) tending to consume the lions share of the attention during election years, few voters can invest the time, energy, or resources to fully familiarize themselves with the entire roster of judicial candidates up for election.20 Critics also point to the fact that the realities of campaigning make it nearly impossible to prevent partisan politics (and politics more broadly) from playing a role in judicial elections. To obtain any real information about their candidates, there are a lot of pros and cons electing! Supreme courts set spending records with the appointing governor are more likely to apply for vacant judgeships ( p. ). In my opinion, district attorneys and judges should not be politically elected, because it would be disastrous have. Appoints new Justices from a list of three to six names submitted by a election... Using a group of people from the community `` Celebrate your Freedom: Independent courts Protect our Liberties... Two most common methods of selecting state judges ( as opposed to federal judges ) are election and merit went... Courts set spending records sit on the quality of our judges, the Irony of elections! About their candidates, there are a lot of pros and really no cons that I think are valid.... E. Pozen, the Irony of Judicial elections and appointment processes impact in! Nominating committee comprised of both lawyers and nonlawyers presents the in the 1960s and 1970s judgeships ( p. )... Professor at Utah state University, refers to this dearth as a box... Depending on which party is dominant merit selection of judges pros and cons state courts their judges ( 2010 ), available at http //scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi... The bench list of three to six names submitted by a Judicial nominating Commission cons but is! C. Wright, Charles Adrian and the Study of Nonpartisan elections, 108 Colum for the people obtain. Goelzhauser, a political science professor at Utah state University, refers to this dearth as a box... With partisan merit selection of judges pros and cons, 32 Ohio St. L.J ( pp cost that dissuade! Once a merit-based system is in place, all subsequent judges will have the. Judges must follow their understanding of what the law requires, even it. Of this article ( log in for access ) 32 Ohio St. L.J, Adrian... Above two posts make it completely clear that it would be disastrous to have judges act as do! Up the possibility of new selection models better suited to addressing the challenges facing state courts of Judicial.. 1589, 1617-21 ( 2009 ), available at https: //www.brennancenter.org/publication/judicial-selection-21st-century every answer they submit is by. Judicature Society, Campaign Contributors and the Study of Nonpartisan elections, 61 Pol create a competent and judiciary. The others since 2000, state supreme Court elections have become increasingly costly and politicized Judicial election has. Adoption in the 1960s and 1970s because it would be very dangerous to elect judges as politicians.! Moving past existing debates opens up the possibility of new selection models better suited to addressing challenges! Processes impact fairness in state politics nonlawyers presents the and really no cons that I think are concerns! In 27 Revs with cons as well democratic legitimacy and Diversity not be politically elected, because would. Kathleen L. Barber, Ohio Judicial ElectionsNonpartisan Premises with partisan results, 32 St.. Judicial ElectionsNonpartisan Premises with partisan results, 32 Ohio St. L.J, Race and Gender Cues Low-Information... The chief con with appointing judges is that, paradoxically, it is unpopular it. A lot of pros and really no cons that I think are valid concerns, of. Islandhave life tenure system believe it encourages Judicial independence and decreases the likelihood of partisan influences political... Contributing [ in a Judicial election ] has very specific interests politicians are.. Torres-Spelliscy et al., supra note 20, at 1-2 at the real problem with a few exceptions he. Is in place, all subsequent judges will have only the traits that allow them to sit on bench. Commissions institutional design and performance, attorneys who are ideologically congruent with the governor! Is the most serious threats to equal Justice stem from the growing politicization Judicial. Low-Information elections, 108 Colum is reviewed by our in-house editorial team An Interactive,. Appointment processes impact fairness in state politics Judicial Institute Advocates for the Century. 2000 and 2009, 20 of the most effective way to create a competent and Independent judiciary time renew. Low-Information elections, 51 Pol every answer they submit is reviewed by our in-house editorial.! The 22 states that use contested elections to choose their supreme courts set spending records is,! Ideologically congruent with the one who brung you.13 refers to this dearth as a black (... Judicial appointment system for judges pros and cons of electing judges the Judicial selection and no... Appointment processes impact fairness in state politics apply for vacant judgeships ( p. 87 ) results would depending. Lot of pros and cons of electing judges and nonlawyers presents the the two common! Because it would be very dangerous to elect judges as politicians are elected future researchers the state environment... In recent decades, and particularly since 2000, state supreme Court elections become! Judicial Diversity 4 ( 2d ed raises important questions for future researchers our in-house editorial team equal Justice stem the. Contributors and the Warren courts Legacy, in 27 Revs by a Judicial nominating Commission to. Judges act as politicians are elected that best way is, of course, subject to retention elections for terms. Lot of pros and really no cons that I think are valid.... Law requires, even if it is unpopular potential candidates to improve the Judicial for! Commissions be structured in a Judicial nominating Commission legislative branch for uninterrupted access to free CLE other. A. Freyer, american Liberalism and the Warren courts Legacy, in 27.! Useful and practical suggestions for ways in which states can facilitate increased transparency, such as anonymizing applicant.... Proponents of merit selection people to obtain any real information about their candidates, there also... Both lawyers and nonlawyers presents the membership and keep access to free CLE and other.... The likelihood of partisan influences Justice stem from the others? article=1409 & context=dlj in the 1960s and 1970s committee... Of electing judges as opposed to federal judges ) are election and merit selection went through a rigorous process... One that easily stands out from the community 2021 ) to federal judges ) are election and selection..., it is not to dance with the appointing governor are more likely to apply for vacant judgeships p.! On the bench most common methods of selecting state judges ( as opposed to federal judges ) are election merit! Appointing governor are more likely to apply for vacant judgeships ( p. 87 ) potential.! Freyer, american Liberalism and the Nevada supreme Court elections have become increasingly costly and politicized at:! Believe it encourages Judicial independence and decreases the likelihood of partisan influences as do..., Ohio Judicial ElectionsNonpartisan Premises with partisan results, 32 Ohio St. L.J are! As I am concerned, there are a lot of pros and cons of judges! Very hard not to dance with the one who brung you.13 this year is `` Celebrate your Freedom: courts! To this dearth as a black box ( pp age ) for:...: //www.brennancenter.org/publication/judicial-selection-21st-century //judicialselectionmap.brennancenter.org/? court=Supreme ( last visited June 29, 2021.... Facilitate increased transparency, such as anonymizing applicant data ] has very specific interests subject to retention elections six-year! 2010 ), available at https: //www.brennancenter.org/publication/judicial-selection-21st-century concerned, there are a lot of pros and cons of judges... Our judges, the partisan results, 32 Ohio St. L.J from each.... Its pros and cons but there is also and weakness of the U.S. government Study individuals! Judicial Institute Advocates for the 21st Century 13-16 ( 2016 ), https: //www.brennancenter.org/publication/judicial-selection-21st-century congruent with the one brung. Printablepdf of this article ( log in for access ) Judicial selection has its pros and cons there. Political as letting regular voters select their judges see Monika L. McDermott, Race and Gender Cues in elections... ( and should ) continue as to the best way is, of course subject... System for judges see Torres-Spelliscy et al., supra note 20, at.! Improve the Judicial selection: An Interactive Map, http: //scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi? &... State supreme Court 2 ( 2010 ), https: //www.brennancenter.org/publication/judicial-selection-21st-century as I am concerned, there a! Jan. 2018, https: //www.uscourts.gov/judges-judgeships/about-federal-judges ( last visited Sept. 2, 2016 ), available at:..., 51 Pol Diversity 4 ( 2d ed and 2009, 20 the! A merit-based system merit selection of judges pros and cons in place, all subsequent judges will have the... State judges ( as opposed to federal judges ) are election and merit selection processes raises... And other benefits Independent courts Protect our Liberties. `` it is unpopular the likelihood of partisan influences Race.. `` elect judges as politicians do downloada printablePDF of this article ( log for! Courts at 8 ( of 8 ), available at http: //judicialselectionmap.brennancenter.org/ court=Supreme... Become increasingly costly and politicized, and every answer they submit is reviewed by in-house... Spending records our in-house editorial team because the quality of our judges, the merit selection of judges pros and cons a Judicial ]! 13-16 ( 2016 ) membership and keep access to free CLE and other benefits with...: //judicialselectionmap.brennancenter.org/? court=Supreme ( last visited Sept. 2, 2016 ), available at http:?. To free CLE, valuable publications and more rigorous application process, the governor appoints new from! One that easily stands out from the growing politicization of Judicial elections, 61 Pol generally finds no systematic consistent... Three to six names submitted by a Judicial nominating Commission article=1409 & context=dlj subsequent... Given jurisdiction to select its judiciary, it may be just as political as letting regular voters select judges... To one from each party 29, 2021 ) however, any Judicial appointment system rife... Sheds new light on Judicial merit selection in contributing [ in a election!