In a corporation, the shareholders receive 1 vote for each share of stock they hold, which is usually based on the amount of money the invested in the company. how much will teachers pensions rise in 2022? In the coalition {P1, P3, P4, P5}, any player except P1 could leave the coalition and it would still meet quota, so only P1 is critical in this coalition. How do we determine the power that each state possesses? Here is the outcome of a hypothetical election: If this country did not use an Electoral College, which candidate would win the election? Create a preference table. A company has 5 shareholders. How many sequential coalitions are there . Another example is in how the President of the United States is elected. /D [9 0 R /XYZ 334.488 0 null] The sequential coalition is used only to figure out the power each player possess. This is quite large, so most calculations using the Shapely-Shubik power index are done with a computer. >> endobj /Trans << /S /R >> endobj Let SS i = number of sequential coalitions where P i is pivotal. We will list all the sequential coalitions and identify the pivotal player. An election resulted in Candidate A winning, with Candidate B coming in a close second, and candidate C being a distant third. For example, a hiring committee may have 30 candidates apply, and need to select 6 to interview, so the voting by the committee would need to produce the top 6 candidates. No two players alone could meet the quota, so all three players are critical in this coalition. shop and save market jobs; lisa scottoline stand alone books It turns out that the three smaller districts are dummies. \left\{\underline{P}_{1,} \underline{P}_{2}\right\} \\ There are four candidates (labeled A, B, C, and D for convenience). 14 0 obj << A contract negotiations group consists of 4 workers and 3 managers. 12 0 obj << If the college can only afford to hire 15 tutors, determine how many tutors should be assigned to each subject. 16? \left\{\underline{P}_{1}, \underline{P}_{3}, \underline{P}_{5}\right\} \quad \left\{\underline{P}_{1}, \underline{P}_{4}, \underline{P}_{5}\right\}\\ This expression is called a N factorial, and is denoted by N!. As Im sure you can imagine, there are billions of possible winning coalitions, so the power index for the Electoral College has to be computed by a computer using approximation techniques. Revisiting the Scottish Parliament, with voting system \([65: 47, 46, 17, 16, 2]\), the winning coalitions are listed, with the critical players underlined. Count Data. Previously, the coalition \(\left\{P_{1}, P_{2}\right\}\) and \(\left\{P_{2}, P_{1}\right\}\) would be considered equivalent, since they contain the same players. >> endobj \(7 !=7 \cdot 6 \cdot 5 \cdot 4 \cdot 3 \cdot 2 \cdot 1=5040\). >> endobj The notation for the weights is \(w_{1}, w_{2}, w_{3}, \dots, w_{N}\), where \(w_1\) is the weight of \(P_1\), \(w_2\) is the weight of \(P_2\), etc. Losing coalition: A coalition whose weight is less than q is a very large number. Weighted voting is sometimes used to vote on candidates, but more commonly to decide yes or no on a proposal, sometimes called a motion. sequential coalitions calculator. B and C share the remaining two permutations, so each has Shapley-Shubik power index equal to 1/6. 23 0 obj << endobj >> endobj Calculate the winner under these conditions. If Players 1 and 2 have veto power but are not dictators, and Player 3 is a dummy: An executive board consists of a president (P) and three vice-presidents (V1,V2,V3). /Filter /FlateDecode A pivotal player is the player in a sequential coalition that changes a coalition from a losing coalition to a winning one. If the legislature has 10 seats, use Hamiltons method to apportion the seats. /Annots [ 11 0 R ] Not all of these coalitions are winning coalitions. The sequential coalition shows the order in which players joined the coalition. /Type /Annot Note: The difference in notation: We use for coalitions and sequential coalitions. Example \(\PageIndex{3}\): Dictator, Veto Power, or Dummy? Compare and contrast this primary with general election system to instant runoff voting, considering both differences in the methods, and practical differences like cost, campaigning, fairness, etc. Every sequential coalition has one and only one pivotal player. P_{4}=2 / 16=1 / 8=12.5 \% Find the Banzhaf power index for the weighted voting system [36: 20, 17, 16, 3]. Most states give all their electoral votes to the candidate that wins a majority in their state, turning the Electoral College into a weighted voting system, in which the states are the players. In order for only one decision to reach quota at a time, the quota must be at least half the total number of votes. Find the Banzhaf power index for the weighted voting system \(\bf{[36: 20, 17, 16, 3]}\). Research how apportionment of legislative seats is done in other countries around the world. So, player one holds all the power. The first thing to do is list all of the sequential coalitions, and then determine the pivotal player in each sequential coalition. Accessibility StatementFor more information contact us atinfo@libretexts.orgor check out our status page at https://status.libretexts.org. /Resources 26 0 R Advanced Math questions and answers. 3 Luglio 2022; dekalb regional medical center ceo; when did ojukwu and bianca get married . Coalitions Coalition: Any set of players.1 Weight of a coalition: The total number of votes controlled by the players in the coalition; that is, the sum of the weights of individual players in the coalition. | \hline \textbf { District } & \textbf { Times critical } & \textbf { Power index } \\ Since the quota is 16, and 16 is more than 15, this system is not valid. Conversion rates in this range will not be distinguishable from the baseline (one-sided test). Sequential coalitions 0 2828 2 Ask a Math Question! To find the pivotal player, we add the players' weights from left to right, one at a time, until the where is how often the player is pivotal, N is the number of players and N! \hline P_{3} & 0 & 0 / 6=0 \% \\ In order to have a meaningful weighted voting system, it is necessary to put some limits on the quota. Sequential Sampling Calculator (Evan's Awesome A/B Tools) Question: How many conversions are needed for a A/B test? /Parent 20 0 R /Font << /F43 15 0 R /F20 17 0 R /F16 16 0 R /F22 26 0 R /F32 27 0 R /F40 28 0 R /F21 29 0 R >> Since the coalition becomes winning when \(P_4\) joins, \(P_4\) is the pivotal player in this coalition. Some states have more Electoral College votes than others, so some states have more power than others. While the Banzhaf power index and Shapley-Shubik power index are usually not terribly different, the two different approaches usually produce somewhat different results. 3 0 obj Idea: The more sequential coalitions for which player P i is pivotal, the more power s/he wields. In fact, seven is one less than , 15 is one less than , and 31 is one less than . To calculate the Shapley-Shubik Power Index: How many sequential coalitions should we expect to have? Counting up times that each player is critical: Divide each players count by 16 to convert to fractions or percents: \(\begin{array}{l} stream >> endobj \(\begin{array}{ll} /Filter /FlateDecode a group of voters where order matters. endobj Guest Oct 19, 2013 2 Answers #1 +118233 0 one trillion is 10 12 The sequential coalitions for three players (P1, P2, P3) are: . Describe how Plurality, Instant Runoff Voting, Borda Count, and Copelands Method could be extended to produce a ranked list of candidates. 11 0 obj << Thus, player four is a dummy. Explain why plurality, instant runoff, Borda count, and Copelands method all satisfy the Pareto condition. how to find the number of sequential coalitionsceustodaemon pathfinder. Notice there can only be one pivotal player in any sequential coalition. In the Electoral College, states are given a number of votes equal to the number of their congressional representatives (house + senate). In the sequential coalition which player is pivotal? the voter whose immediate sequential presence changes the vote from lose to win. When this happens, we say that player 1 is a dictator. 35 0 obj << sicily villas for sale. We now need to consider the order in which players join the coalition. The plurality method is used in most U.S. elections. We start by listing all winning coalitions. Each individual or entity casting a vote is called a player in the election. xVMs0+t$c:MpKsP@`cc&rK^v{bdA2`#xF"%hD$rHm|WT%^+jGqTHSo!=HuLvx TG9;*IOwQv64J) u(dpv!#*x,dNR3 4)f2-0Q2EU^M: JSR0Ji5d[ 1 LY5`EY`+3Tfr0c#0Z\! There are a lot of them! /Font << /F15 6 0 R /F21 9 0 R /F37 31 0 R /F22 18 0 R /F23 15 0 R >> Any winning coalition requires two of the larger districts. In this method, the choices are assigned an order of comparison, called an agenda. To be allowed to play, the student needs approval from the head coach and at least one assistant coach. Notice that a player with veto power will be critical in every winning coalition, since removing their support would prevent a proposal from passing. It is not necessary to put numbers in all of the boxes, but you should fill them in order, starting at the upper left and moving toward the lower right. /A << /S /GoTo /D (Navigation1) >> The LibreTexts libraries arePowered by NICE CXone Expertand are supported by the Department of Education Open Textbook Pilot Project, the UC Davis Office of the Provost, the UC Davis Library, the California State University Affordable Learning Solutions Program, and Merlot. Using the Shapley-Shubik method, is it possible for a dummy to be pivotal? /ProcSet [ /PDF /Text ] \left\{\underline{P}_{1,} \underline{P}_{2}, P_{3}\right\} \quad \left\{\underline{P}_{1}, \underline{P}_{2}, P_{4}\right\} \\ While the Banzhaf power index and Shapley-Shubik power index are usually not terribly different, the two different approaches usually produce somewhat different results. Meets quota. Consider the weighted voting system [31: 10,10,8,7,6,4,1,1], Consider the weighted voting system [q: 7,5,3,1,1]. From the last few examples, we know that if there are three players in a weighted voting system, then there are seven possible coalitions. Interestingly, even though the Liberal Democrats party has only one less representative than the Conservative Party, and 14 more than the Scottish Green Party, their Banzhaf power index is the same as the Scottish Green Partys. \end{array}\). /Contents 25 0 R This is the same answer as the Banzhaf power index. Combining these possibilities, the total number of coalitions would be:\(N(N-1)(N-2)(N-3) \cdots(3)(2)(1)\). A school district has two high schools: Lowell, serving 1715 students, and Fairview, serving 7364. /Type /Annot >> endobj The Shapley-Shubik power index of player P i is the fraction i = SS i total number of sequential coalitions. What is the smallest value for q that results in exactly two players with veto power? \left\{\underline{P}_{2}, P_{3}, P_{4}, P_{5}\right\} \\ The marketing committee at a company decides to vote on a new company logo. Copy the link below to share this result with others: The Minimum Detectable Effect is the smallest effect that will be detected (1-)% of the time. First, input the number five on the home screen of the calculator. Consider the weighted voting system [q: 15, 8, 3, 1] Find the Banzhaf power distribution of this weighted voting system. The total weight is . Once you choose one for the first spot, then there are only 2 players to choose from for the second spot. the brotherhood 1984 quotes; cabbage and apples german. \(\begin{aligned} They decide to use approval voting. Treating the percentages of ownership as the votes, the system looks like: \([58: 30,25,22,14,9]\). \hline P_{1} \text { (Scottish National Party) } & 9 & 9 / 27=33.3 \% \\ In the Electoral College, states are given a number of votes equal to the number of their congressional representatives (house + senate). Please enter voting weights, with their multiplicities. A small country consists of three states, whose populations are listed below. Thus, when we continue on to determine the critical player(s), we only need to list the winning coalitions. Altogether, P1 is critical 3 times, P2 is critical 1 time, and P3 is critical 1 time. The top candidate from each party then advances to the general election. If the quota was set at only 3, then player 1 could vote yes, players 2 and 3 could vote no, and both would reach quota, which doesnt lead to a decision being made. Consider the weighted voting system [15: 13, 9, 5, 2]. The Banzhaf power index measures a players ability to influence the outcome of the vote. How many sequential coalitions are there for N players? A plurality? Posted on July 2, 2022 by July 2, 2022 by \hline \text { Hempstead #2 } & 31 \\ So we can start with the three player coalitions. If \(P_1\) were to leave, the remaining players could not reach quota, so \(P_1\) is critical. xUS\4t~o Every player has some power. P_{3}=1 / 5=20 \% \(\mathrm{P}_{1}\) is pivotal 3 times, \(\mathrm{P}_{2}\) is pivotal 3 times, and \(\mathrm{P}_{3}\) is pivotal 0 times. stream \hline Sequential Pairwise voting is a method not commonly used for political elections, but sometimes used for shopping and games of pool. Suppose that you have a supercomputer that can list one trillion (10^12) sequential coalitions per second. xVMs0+t$c:MpKsP@`cc&rK^v{bdA2`#xF"%hD$rHm|WT%^+jGqTHSo!=HuLvx TG9;*IOwQv64J) u(dpv!#*x,dNR3 4)f2-0Q2EU^M: JSR0Ji5d[ 1 LY5`EY`+3Tfr0c#0Z\! Half of 15 is 7.5, so the quota must be . /D [9 0 R /XYZ 334.488 0 null] Which candidate wins under approval voting? Post author By ; impossible burger font Post date July 1, 2022; southern california hunting dog training . Consider a weighted voting system with three players. In the system , player three has a weight of two. The tally is below, where each column shows the number of voters with the particular approval vote. is the number of sequential coalitions. G'Y%2G^8G L\TBej#%)^F5_99vrAFlv-1Qlt/%bZpf{+OG'n'{Z| A player who has no power is called a dummy. The Shapley-Shubik power index counts how likely a player is to be pivotal. Interestingly, even though the Liberal Democrats party has only one less representative than the Conservative Party, and 14 more than the Scottish Green Party, their Banzhaf power index is the same as the Scottish Green Partys. Idea: The more sequential coalitions for which player P i is pivotal, the more power s/he wields. Can we come up with a mathematical formula for the number of sequential coalitions? In parliamentary governments, forming coalitions is an essential part of getting results, and a partys ability to help a coalition reach quota defines its influence. We also acknowledge previous National Science Foundation support under grant numbers 1246120, 1525057, and 1413739. K\4^q@4rC]-OQAjp_&.m5|Yh&U8 @u~{AsGx!7pmEy1p[dzXJB$_U$NWN_ak:lBpO(tq@!+@S ?_r5zN\qb >p Ua /Length 685 The Shapley-Shubik power index of player P i is the fraction i = SS i total number of sequential coalitions. Consider the weighted voting system \([6: 4, 3, 2]\). There will be \(7!\) sequential coalitions. E2bFsP-DO{w"".+?8zBA+j;jZH5)|FdEJw:J!e@DjbO,0Gp For comparison, the Banzhaf power index for the same weighted voting system would be \(\mathrm{P}_{1}: 60 \%, \mathrm{P}_{2}: 20 \%, \mathrm{P}_{3}: 20 \%\). what are the non legislative powers of congress. Arithmetic Sequence Formula: an = a1 +d(n 1) a n = a 1 + d ( n - 1) Geometric Sequence Formula: an = a1rn1 a n = a 1 r n - 1 Step 2: How many sequential coalitions will there be in a voting system with 7 players? sequential coalitions calculatorlittles shoes pittsburgh. If the sum is the quota or more, then the coalition is a winning coalition. If the legislature has 200 seats, apportion the seats. Translated into a weighted voting system, assuming a simple majority is needed for a proposal to pass: Listing the winning coalitions and marking critical players: There are a lot of them! Compare and contrast the top two primary with general election system to instant runoff voting, considering both differences in the methods, and practical differences like cost, campaigning, fairness, etc. How many winning coalitions will there be? The county was divided up into 6 districts, each getting voting weight proportional to the population in the district, as shown below. The quota must be over half the total weights and cannot be more than total weight. 30 0 obj << is the factorial button. [q?a)/`OhEA7V wCu'vi8}_|2DRM>EBk'?y`:B-_ It turns out that the three smaller districts are dummies. /Type /Page If for some reason the election had to be held again and many people who had voted for C switched their preferences to favor A, which caused B to become the winner, which is the primary fairness criterion violated in this election? Since there are five players, there are 31 coalitions. This means player 5 is a dummy, as we noted earlier. Notice that 5! In the three-person coalition, either P2 or P3 could leave the coalition and the remaining players could still meet quota, so neither is critical. stream The votes are: If there are 4 candidates, what is the smallest number of votes that a plurality candidate could have? The weighted voting system that Americans are most familiar with is the Electoral College system used to elect the President. A player is a dummy if their vote is never essential for a group to reach quota. Four options have been proposed. /Annots [ 22 0 R ] /Trans << /S /R >> Legal. Apportion those coins to the investors. Calculate the power index for each district. \left\{P_{1}, P_{2}, P_{3}, P_{4}, P_{5}\right\} { "3.01:_Introduction" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "3.02:_Beginnings" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "3.03:_A_Look_at_Power" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "3.04:_Calculating_Power-__Banzhaf_Power_Index" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "3.05:_Calculating_Power-__Shapley-Shubik_Power_Index" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "3.06:_Exercises(Skills)" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "3.07:_Exercises(Concepts)" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "3.08:_Exercises(Exploration)" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()" }, { "00:_Front_Matter" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "01:_Problem_Solving" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "02:_Voting_Theory" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "03:_Weighted_Voting" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "04:_Apportionment" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "05:_Fair_Division" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "06:_Graph_Theory" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "07:_Scheduling" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "08:_Growth_Models" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "09:_Finance" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "10:_Statistics" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "11:_Describing_Data" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "12:_Probability" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "13:_Sets" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "14:_Historical_Counting_Systems" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "15:_Fractals" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "16:_Cryptography" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "17:_Logic" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "18:_Solutions_to_Selected_Exercises" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "zz:_Back_Matter" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()" }, 3.5: Calculating Power- Shapley-Shubik Power Index, [ "article:topic", "license:ccbysa", "showtoc:no", "authorname:lippman", "Shapley-Shubik power index", "pivotal player", "licenseversion:30", "source@http://www.opentextbookstore.com/mathinsociety" ], https://math.libretexts.org/@app/auth/3/login?returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fmath.libretexts.org%2FBookshelves%2FApplied_Mathematics%2FMath_in_Society_(Lippman)%2F03%253A_Weighted_Voting%2F3.05%253A_Calculating_Power-__Shapley-Shubik_Power_Index, \( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}}}\) \( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash{#1}}} \)\(\newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\) \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\) \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \(\newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\) \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\) \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)\(\newcommand{\AA}{\unicode[.8,0]{x212B}}\), 3.4: Calculating Power- Banzhaf Power Index, source@http://www.opentextbookstore.com/mathinsociety, status page at https://status.libretexts.org, In each sequential coalition, determine the pivotal player, Count up how many times each player is pivotal, Convert these counts to fractions or decimals by dividing by the total number of sequential coalitions. /Font << /F43 15 0 R /F16 16 0 R /F20 17 0 R >> /Length 1404 Estimate how long in years it would take the computer list all sequential coalitions of 21 players. >> endobj Reapportion the previous problem if 37 gold coins are recovered. Advanced Math. \(\) would mean that \(P_2\) joined the coalition first, then \(P_1\), and finally \(P_3\). In the weighted voting system \([17: 12,7,3]\), determine the Shapely-Shubik power index for each player. In a corporate shareholders meeting, each shareholders vote counts proportional to the amount of shares they own. @f9rIx83{('l{/'Y^}n _zfCVv:0TiZ%^BRN]$")ufGf[i9fg @A{ A small country consists of five states, whose populations are listed below. /Type /Page The total weight is . In a primary system, a first vote is held with multiple candidates. Determine the outcome. [p& _s(vyX6 @C}y%W/Y)kV2nRB0h!8'{;1~v Find the winner under the plurality method. %PDF-1.4 This is called a sequential coalition. So the coalition \(\{\mathrm{P} 3, \mathrm{P} 4\}\) is not a winning coalition because the combined weight is \(16+3=19\), which is below the quota. Note that we have already determined which coalitions are winning coalitions for this weighted voting system in Example \(\PageIndex{4}\). The votes are shown below. /Filter /FlateDecode In this form, \(q\) is the quota, \(w_1\)is the weight for player 1, and so on. The way to denote a weighted voting system is \(\left[q: w_{1}, w_{2}, w_{3}, \dots, w_{N}\right]\). Translated into a weighted voting system, assuming a simple majority is needed for a proposal to pass: Listing the winning coalitions and marking critical players: \(\begin{array} {lll} {\{\underline{\mathrm{H} 1}, \underline{\mathrm{H} 2}\}} & {\{\underline{\mathrm{H} 1}, \underline{\mathrm{OB}}, \mathrm{NH}\}} & {\{\underline{\mathrm{H} 2}, \underline{\mathrm{OB}}, \mathrm{NH}, \mathrm{LB}\}} \\{\{\underline{\mathrm{H} 1}, \underline{\mathrm{OB}}\}} & {\{\underline{\mathrm{H} 1}, \underline{\mathrm{OB}}, \mathrm{LB}\}} & {\{\underline{\mathrm{H} 2}, \underline{\mathrm{OB}}, \mathrm{NH}, \mathrm{GC}}\} \\{\{\underline{\mathrm{H} 2}, \underline{\mathrm{OB}}\}} & {\{\underline{\mathrm{H} 1}, \underline{\mathrm{OB}}, \mathrm{GC}\}} & {\{\underline{\mathrm{H} 2}, \underline{\mathrm{OB}}, \mathrm{LB}, \mathrm{GC}}\} \\{\{\underline{\mathrm{H} 1}, \underline{\mathrm{H} 2}, \mathrm{NH}\}} & {\{\underline{\mathrm{H} 1}, \underline{\mathrm{OB}}, \mathrm{NH}, \mathrm{LB}\}} & {\{\underline{\mathrm{H} 2}, \underline{\mathrm{OB}}, \mathrm{NH}, \mathrm{LB}, \mathrm{GC}\}} \\{\{\underline{\mathrm{H} 1}, \underline{\mathrm{H} 2}, \mathrm{LB}\}} & {\{\underline{\mathrm{H} 1}, \mathrm{OB}, \mathrm{NH}, \mathrm{GC}\}} & {\{\mathrm{H} 1, \mathrm{H} 2, \mathrm{OB}\}} \\{\{\underline{\mathrm{H} 1}, \underline{\mathrm{H} 2}, \mathrm{GC}\}} & {\{\underline{\mathrm{H} 1}, \underline{\mathrm{OB}}, \mathrm{LB}, \mathrm{GC}\}} & {\{\mathrm{H} 1, \mathrm{H} 2, \mathrm{OB}, \mathrm{NH}\}} \\{\{\underline{\mathrm{H} 1}, \underline{\mathrm{H} 2}, \mathrm{NH}, \mathrm{LB}\}} & {\{\underline{\mathrm{H} 1}, \underline{\mathrm{OB}}, \mathrm{NH}, \mathrm{LB} .